Armed Forces, Peace and Democracy
The Peace Dove by Picasso

Armed Forces, Peace and Democracy

deutsch Deutsch   english English   español Español   français Français   russian русский  
Home > The Letter of the Month > Letters of 2009

Letter of the Month of February- "45th Munich Conference"

Thaw in international relations?

„The political springtide 2009 begins early, and it begins at Munich“ Ambassador Wolfgang Ischinger, Director of the Munich Security Conference announced.

The Munich Security Conference, the biggest event in the field of foreign and security policy, held on a yearly basis, regularly gives important impetus for international relations. The 45th edition this year rightly was expected to be more exciting than the years before.

The fact that US President Obama has sent his Vice President Joseph Biden to attend the conference was understood as a clear signal: the U.S. is increasingly refocusing on dialog in international relations.

Approximately 300 high-ranking and top-level participants from more than 50 countries, , suspensefully expected his discourse. But the adresses delivered by some other high-ranking members of the new U.S administration were also recorded with gratification, especially because all of them underlined their willingness, to renew the partnership with Europe. The key-information, according to Ambassador Ischinger, was “a clear message to the world of new determination to call a spade a spade and to tackle problems conjointly”.

And the climate between Russia, the United States and NATO also begins to thaw. Repeatedly the participants, among whom a dozen heads of state and government, corroborated their preparedness for a new start in international relations. They all want to afford constructive contributions to the configuration of a global security architecture answering to the challenges of the 21th century.

We are very greatful to the organizers of the conference, that all speeches and comments are downloadable free of charges for divulgation. So we can deepen our exchange we began with our letter from New Year on security and peace construction sites of 2009, now taking into account new ideas recently presented by responsable politicians from both sides of the atlantic ocean.

We thus use the Letter of the Month of February to dicuss the most crucial notes produced by the special conference correspondent Oliver Rolofs.

The different speeches and other informations can be downloaded directly from the conference-site: http://www.securityconference.de .

Copyright : © 1999 – 2009 Münchner Sicherheitskonferenz / Munich Security Conference

Notice of the host:

To ensure an unbiased media coverage, the website features summaries of ongoing events. It is permitted to download and use the texts free of charge provided that the name of the author is indicated.

It is permitted to download and use the pictures free of charge provided that the name of the photographer is indicated. The pictures are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Germany License.

The much-anticipated speech by US Vice President Joseph Biden was the focus of attention at the conference on Saturday at noon. He emphasized that the new US foreign policy under President Barack Obama would comprise both a willingness to talk and a consistent call for international cooperation, thus reviving the partnership with Europe. Biden announced a new tone in US foreign policy: "America needs the world, just as the world needs America." The Vice President of the USA, Joseph R. Biden at Saturday morning. Photograph by Harald Dettenborn {JPG} At the same time, he left no doubt that the new willingness to talk was linked to the expectation that the partners of the United States would make greater efforts to defend their common values and goals. In Munich, this was interpreted as a request for a more consistent support of the United States in military terms as well, for example in Afghanistan. Following some speculation, the US Vice President for the first time officially announced that the United States would ask other states to take in detainees from the US prison camp at Guantanamo. "We need your help," Biden said in a general statement directed at German Chancellor Merkel.

New Dialogue with Moscow

With regard to Russia, the Vice President announced a renewal of relations, including possibilities for cooperation. While Washington would continue to adhere to the plans for a missile defense system in Central Europe, he guaranteed that this would not be done without consultation. He added that this also applied to missile technology, a field in which the United States were planning to cooperate with Moscow. Biden also called for a new start in the relations to NATO. "The United States rejects the notion that Russia’s strength is NATO’s weakness." Dr. Henry A. Kissinger (le) and Sergej B. Iwanov (ri), Deputy Prime Minister, Russian Federation. Photography by Harald Dettenborn {JPG}

Just the day before, Russian Deputy Prime Minister Ivanov had warned the United States not to adhere to their missile defense planning. He urged the United States to include Moscow in the plans for a missile defense shield in Central and Eastern Europe. According to Ivanov, Russia was willing to discuss cooperation regarding the issue of the missile defense shield and suggested that if after analyzing the threat together, Russia and the USA would actually find a threat, they would tackle the problem together. He offered that radar systems in the south of Russia could also be used for this purpose.

The US Administration’s new tone towards Russia and the remaining world mark the beginning of a multilateral reorientation of Washington’s policy. It is now up to the United States to fill the new way of international cooperation it has announced with concrete contents, while Europe must make its own explicit ideas known to Washington instead of waiting for the Obama Administration to take further initial measures.

Start of a New Era in Disarmament Policy

The Federal Minister of Foreign Affairs, Germany, Dr. Frank-Walter Steinmeier, during his speech. Photography by Sebastian Zwez {JPG} New signs of hope were also discernible in Munich in the area of disarmament policy. German Minister of Foreign Affairs Frank-Walter Steinmeier opened the 45th Munich Security Conference with an impassioned call for a new era in global disarmament policy. Steinmeier welcomed the new way of thinking offered by President Obama in the entire spectrum of disarmament and security policy, claiming that the window of history was now open.

Following Steinmeier’s speech, former US Secretary of State and Nobel Peace Prize Laureate Henry Kissinger explicitly warned against the threats posed by nuclear arms in an environment of regional conflicts. Since the atomic bombings in Japan in 1945 it had been possible to avoid further nuclear strikes. However, he went on, the sharpening of ideological dividing lines and in particular the persistence of unresolved regional conflicts had magnified the incentives to acquire nuclear weapons, especially by rogue states or non-state actors. Therefore, the former US Secretary of State called for increased efforts to resolve regional conflicts. Dr. Frank-Walter Steinmeier (le), Dr. Henry A. Kissinger (mi) and Botschafter Wolfgang Ischinger (ri) during the panel discussion. Photography by Harald Dettenborn {JPG}

The Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Mohamed ElBaradei, also warned that more and more states might get access to nuclear weapons and urged global disarmament. Against this background he called for a collective security system to meet the needs of the 21st century, finally leaving behind a level that had existed since 1945. The most important element of the fight against nuclear weapons, however, was the fight against poverty, ElBaradei stressed.

Russia and the United States Consider Nuclear Disarmament

Relations between nuclear powers USA and Russia showed first signs of thaw here as well. US considerations aimed at reducing the number of nuclear warheads on both sides by eighty percent were met with approval by Moscow. Also, hopes were raised in Munich for negotiations about a successor for the START disarmament treaty that is due to expire soon.

This was supported by German Chancellor Angela Merkel. She called for courageous steps towards disarmament and efficient arms control that should be combined with the integration of Russia into the European security architecture. Moscow supported this demand by suggesting a revival of the suspended CFE Treaty, which establishes ceilings for troops and conventional weapons in Europe. In spite of Steinmeier’s and Merkel’s calls for a worldwide reduction of nuclear arsenals, French President Nicolas Sarkozy made it clear on Saturday morning that France would not do without nuclear weapons.

Obama’s Change not yet Reached Tehran

Dr. Ali A. Larijani, Speaker of the Majlis, Tehran, during his speech on Friday. Photography by Harald Dettenborn {JPG} A reaction of the Speaker of the Iranian Parliament, Ali Larijani, to the new US Administration’s offer to enter into a direct dialogue was also highly anticipated in Munich. However, during a discussion on disarmament and non-proliferation held on Friday afternoon, the former Iranian nuclear negotiator for the time being rejected US President Obama’s offer to talk. Instead, he harshly criticized the United States. He denied the West the right of influence on the Iranian nuclear program. Larijani accused the United States of applying double standards by tolerating the Israeli nuclear program and the nuclear tests conducted by Pakistan and India while condemning his country for its nuclear policy. The Speaker of the Iranian Parliament called for a new policy regarding the current six-nation nuclear talks with his country. "The old carrot-and-stick cliché must be abandoned," Larijani said.

However, Larijani also sent some positive signals at the Munich Conference. He welcomed Obama’s decision to send special envoy George Mitchell to the Middle East. “This is a positive signal,” Larijani said. If the political attitude towards Tehran changed, Iran would be willing to cooperate in elaborating new security concepts, he pointed out. In the past years, the United States had burned many bridges. "The new White House can rebuild them", the Speaker of the Iranian Parliament emphasized.

Extended Hand to Remain Open to Iran

Despite Larijani’s harsh criticism of the United States, the US Administration was not fully disappointed. The National Security Advisor of the US President, James Jones, said that the hand of reconciliation would remain extended. US Vice President Biden made it clear that Iran had to guarantee to abandon its nuclear program. If it did, he continued, Iran would benefit both economically and politically. If Iran remains defiant, however, Germany, France, the United Kingdom and the United States intend to push for more severe UN sanctions against Tehran.

Many conference participants felt that the attendance of Larijari was a first sign of Iranian readiness to talk. His apparent rejection of a dialogue could also have something to do with his possible candidature in this year’s presidential elections in Iran. Too much cooperation with the West could minimize his political chances in Iran. It also became clear, however, that Iran is still having difficulty finding a clear way out of years of international isolation.

Call for International Cooperation in the 21st Century

Prior to the keynote speech given by US Vice President Joe Biden, German Chancellor Angela Merkel, French President Nicolas Sarkozy and Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk stated their views on European security and relations with Russia. Merkel and Sarkozy called for increased international cooperation in matters of foreign and security policy which should involve not only the United States but also emerging nations in Asia and South America. Today, current global conflicts could "no longer be solved by any one country alone; we need one another," the Chancellor pointed out. In the following diskussion (f le): Ambassador Wolfgang Ischinger, Nicolas Sarkozy, Dr. Angela Merkel, and Donald F. Tusk. Photography by Harald Dettenborn

She added that the comprehensive approach, which included development, economic and environmental efforts, was the appropriate response to crises and wars and to their prevention in the 21st century. At the Conference, Merkel and Sarkozy also announced that a Bundeswehr unit would be stationed in France, a decision designed to express and deepen the German-French friendship.

Russia to be Part of European Security Architecture

With regard to European security, Sarkozy spoke in favor of reconciliation between the European Union and Russia. "After the gas crisis and the crisis in Georgia, we have to restore confidence," the French President said. He referred to a vision of former French President Charles de Gaulle, who associated a "Europe from the Atlantic to the Urals" with a common European peace order. Sarkozy renewed this vision, directed at Russia, with the goal of creating a "common space for people and the economy", as it was created between Germany and France after World War II. He stressed he did not believe that Russia posed a military threat to the EU or NATO. His aim was to reinforce the international security architecture “from Vancouver to Vladivostok” by explicitly engaging Russia. He said the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) would be a suitable framework for this effort.

Critical Voices on Russia from the EU, NATO and Eastern Europe

European reconciliation with Russia was, however, also accompanied by criticism directed at Moscow. Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk and Czech Vice Prime Minister Alexandr Vondra criticised Russia’s position in the gas dispute with Ukraine and insisted that the US missile defence system be sited in their countries. There is still a great mistrust of Russia in Central and Eastern Europe. Tusk said: "Without full confidence, more openness towards Russia is impossible."

Dr. Javier Madariaga Solana (le) and Yulia V. Tymoshenko (mi), in Conversation. Photography by Kai Mörk {JPG} NATO Secretary General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer and EU High Representative Javier Solana also deplored the "general atmosphere of mistrust" prevailing against Moscow and voiced their concern over the cooled relationship of the EU and NATO with Russia.

Criticism was also leveled at Moscow’s policy regarding breakaway provinces, which had led to a war with Georgia in the summer of 2008. Estonia’s President Thomas Ilves criticized the fact that the border changes brought about during the war between Russia and Georgia had not had any consequences. He doubted that the Russian proposal for a new security architecture in Europe would be of much help. Ukrainian Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko advocated an accession of Ukraine to NATO so that it could be integrated into the European security architecture.

More European Commitment in NATO Framework expected

With regard to a revision of NATO strategy in the run-up to the 60th NATO Summit, German Chancellor Merkel said that the “comprehensive approach” should also be reflected in the new NATO strategy. Merkel called for a strengthening of NATO, which should once again be "the place for political discussions”. She said that NATO was the "central anchor of the transatlantic alliance". US Vice President Biden and NATO Secretary General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer called for a stronger European commitment in the framework of NATO.

Biden in particular called for a highly flexible NATO that stands by the United States, while de Hoop Scheffer explicitly called for a stronger commitment of Europe in Afghanistan. He stressed that the new US Administration was not just waiting for good advice but expected Europe to take on new tasks. He urged NATO members to understand that NATO’s transatlantic partnership was based on reciprocity and was thus a "two-way street".

The new US National Security Advisor, James Jones, also addressed a new NATO strategy on Sunday morning. In his view, NATO stands at a crossroads. Security today, he said, could no longer be limited to terrorism and the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction but also included the illegal drug trade, energy security, and ecological disasters. At the same time, Jones proposed restructuring NATO from a defense alliance to a security alliance.

Litmus Test for NATO in Afghanistan

The 45th Munich Security Conference came to a close on Sunday morning with a discussion on the future of NATO and its central military mission in Afghanistan. US National Security Advisor Jones called for a change in the long-term strategy of the West in Afghanistan. The Alliance could not afford to fail in Afghanistan, the former general stated. The mission in Afghanistan was an "enormous task" for NATO. Support for the Taliban from along the Pakistani border posed a particular threat, Jones said. The Federal Minister of Defense, Dr. Franz Josef Jung (le), the President of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan, Hamid Karzai (mi) and James L. Jones (re), US National Security Advisor. Photography by Sebastian Zwez {JPG}

Afghanistan’s President Hamid Karzai, who attended the conference in Munich for the first time, urged NATO to show more consideration for the population during operations in his country. The high number of civilian casualties during the international military mission in Afghanistan was one reason for the declining support of the population for the administration in Kabul, Karzai said. He welcomed in particular the German contribution to the training of police officers.

Richard Holbrooke, US Special Representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan, called for new ideas, better coordination between the United States and its allies, and "a lot of time" for the NATO mission. He said no quick solution was expected for the crisis situation in Afghanistan and the region and there was no "magic formula" for it. The conflict with the Taliban could only be defused by a regional approach.

German Minister of Defense Franz-Josef Jung advocated more intensive civil reconstruction efforts and highlighted the progress accomplished so far in Afghanistan. Based on the concept of the "comprehensive approach", the development of Afghan security forces had to be intensified and expanded. Jung emphasized: "Now more than ever before, we can say that in Afghanistan there can be no development without security and no security without development."

Concrete Request to Europe at Close of Conference

David Petraeus, Commander, US Central Command. Photography by Sebastian Zwez {JPG} Whereas US Vice President Biden had worded his expectation of the partners of the United States in quite general terms the day before, calling for greater efforts to defend common values and goals, the commander-in-chief of US forces in the Middle East and Central Asia, General David Petraeus, surprised European decision-makers with concrete demands: Europe had to guarantee stronger participation in the NATO mission in Afghanistan. With this request, the brilliant strategist who brought about significant improvements in the US operation in Iraq made a clear call for European NATO members to send additional combat forces to Afghanistan and to extend their financial support and cooperation with the Afghan government.

Europe’s Turn Now

The request made by Petraeus makes it clear that Europe can no longer wait for President Obama to act and decide. The wait-and-see policy adopted in European capitals can no longer be maintained. An independent and constructive contribution by Europe is now required in the context of foreign and security policy. The expectations from Washington are clear: Now it is Europe’s turn to make a joint independent contribution to a global security architecture for the 21st century. The keynote speeches given by French President Sarkozy and German Chancellor Merkel give cause for hope that the "political spring of 2009" really has begun in Munich this month.

The different speeches and other informations can be downloaded directly from the conference-site: http://www.securityconference.de .

Copyright : © 1999 – 2009 Münchner Sicherheitskonferenz / Munich Security Conference

Notice of the host:

To ensure an unbiased media coverage, the website features summaries of ongoing events. It is permitted to download and use the texts free of charge provided that the name of the author is indicated.

It is permitted to download and use the pictures free of charge provided that the name of the photographer is indicated. The pictures are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Germany License.

Published in February 2009 by Oliver Rolofs

---

Latest comments ( 2 )

En parcourant la lettre du mois et l’article sur la préparation du Congrès de Bogotà du 20 au 25 avril prochain, je me permets les quelques réflexions personnelles, que l’on retrouve d’ailleurs dans mes textes

Je suis tout à fait convaincu qu’il faut que les sociétés, militaire et civile, se connaissent et se reconnaissent davantage. Elles doivent donc se rencontrer comme vous le faites.

Mais je crois que tout comme lorsque je travaille sur la nécessité de préparer vingt, trente ans et plus, de vie en situation de retraite, il faut commencer le plus tôt possible.

Je regrette beaucoup les mouvements de jeunesse de mon époque, le scoutisme en particulier, où nous retrouvions, tous les quatre ans, au jamboree, nos copains venus de nombreux pays. Notre encadrement se faisait entre nous les plus âgés de quelques années prenant en charge leurs cadets. Nous reprenions l’encadrement des plus jeunes à notre tour.

Nous apprenions la solidarité, la responsabilité, l’éthique et la légitimité. Nous apprenions à régler nos conflits, nous étions responsables devant nous même et nos copains, on ne voyait pas les parents pour gérer notre camp.

Je crois que, dans cette société qu’il faut construire autrement: la société militaire aurait intérêt à mieux se faire connaître, elle a un rôle essentiel à remplir dans la «fabrication» de femmes et d’hommes responsables.

Vous pourriez re-créer ces «espaces de rencontre et de partage d’apprentissage de vie» à coté des quelques mouvements de scoutisme qui vivotent encore.

Vous avez à développer encore davantage les rôles des «réservistes» dans les trois armées. Je regrette toujours de ne pas avoir suivi, mais je ne disposais que de 24 heures par jour et je n’ai jamais connu l’ennui…

Un, ou une jeune en attente de travail, serait aussi bien dans une «caserne» (il faut ré-apprendre la fonction et le rôle aux populations civiles) à passer quelques semaines dans le cadre d’une «activité de construction sociale», en l’attente d’un nouvel emploi ou nouvelle formation, par exemple, plutôt que de rester dans son quartier avec les tentations pas toujours très saines.

Ceux de 55 ans, jetés de leur travail, pourraient s’éloigner un peu de leur milieu pour retrouver une santé, l’esprit d’entreprendre autre chose, autrement, construire un vrai projet de vie.

La paix du monde se fera par le concours de toutes et de tous, et aujourd’hui, il me semble, nous avons besoin de beaucoup de volontaires.

Une nécessité également, le lien très étroit avec l’éducation et la formation tout au long de la vie. Il faut établir une collaboration constructive et dynamique entre les différents ministères concernés. Il faut une politique qui pense 2100… c’est demain.

Amitiés à toute l’équipe


Merci, cher Pierre, pour ces "réflexions" pertinentes. En effet, les armées francaises (et quelques autres forces armées européennes) s’éfforcent de remplir le(s) rôle(s) que leur proposes, notamment celui d’enseigner le civisme et la culture de défense. Mais les sociétés ont constemment réduit les moyens, financiers d’abord et structurels après, pour ensuite se pleindre du peu d’encadrement qui s’occupe encore des jeunes ou des réservistes.

D’un autre côté : mieux vaudrait que la société civile prenne ses responsabilités dans l’éducation civique au lieu d’entretenir un instrument armé surdimensionné pour suppléer les parents (premiers responsables) et les institutions éducatives....

by Manfred Rosenberger, 30 March 2009


---

Reply to this article

pre-moderation

This forum is moderated beforehand: your contribution will only appear after being validated by a site administrator.

Any message or comment?

(To create paragraphs, you simply leave blank lines.)

Hypertext link (optional)

(If your message refers to an article published on the web or to a page providing further information, please enter the title of the page and its URL below).

Who are you? (optional)

- Legal Notices - Contact -